[Pregnancy after intrauterine insemination following hysterosalpingo-foam-sonography or hysterosalpingography]. / Grossesse par insémination intra-utérine après hystérosalpingo-foam-sonographie ou hystérosalpingographie.

OBJECTIVE: To compare clinical pregnancy rates following intrauterine insemination performed after hysterosalpingography (HSG) or hysterosalpingo-foam-sonography (HyFoSy). MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a retrospective study including 242 intrauterine insemination (IUI) performed between 2015 and 2020 at the fertility center of the Reunion Island. Among these inseminations, 121 with previous HSG and 121 with previous HyFoSy were matched. The main outcome of interest was clinical pregnancy rate. Secondary outcomes were birth rate and time to pregnancy after tubal patency test. RESULTS: The pregnancy rate after insemination was 9.9% for the HSG group and 11.6% for the HyFoSy group, with no statistically significant difference between the groups (P=0.66). The live birth rate was similar in the two groups (7.4% for HSG and 10.7% for HyFoSy; P=0.37). Over half (57.1%) of the pregnancies occurred within 6 months after HyFoSy, whereas only 8.3% after HSG. CONCLUSION: IUI results are not influenced by HyFoSy compared to HSG with regard to the pregnancy rates. Use of HyFoSy in infertility assessment allows global evaluation and more rapid adapted management. This approach could optimize management of patients undergoing IUI.

Factors associated with non-visualisation of tubal patency during Hysterosalpingo-Foam-Sonography.

OBJECTIVE: Investigate potential factors associated with non-visualisation of tubal patency during Hysterosalpingo-Foam-Sonography (HyFoSy). STUDY DESIGN: This retrospective study was carried out at the medically assisted procreation centre of the University Hospital Centre in Reunion Island and focuses on HyFoSy performed between 01/01/2018 and 31/12/2020. We aimed to compare HyFoSy with bilateral tubal patency and those with a passage defect. Factors associated with non-visualisation of the contrast medium were investigated using comparison tests and logistic regression. Explanatory variables were patient history and ultrasound characteristics. RESULTS: 137 eligible HyFoSy were included, of which 70.8% could be established for bilateral tubal patency. The assessment of tubal patency decreased in cases of overweight/obesity (62.5% versus 47.4%), previous pelvic surgery (17.5% versus 10.3%) and deep endometriosis (12.5% versus 5.2%), without significant difference. In the logistic regression model, a trend towards significance was observed for body mass index ≥ 25 kg/m² (OR 2.01 [95% CI 0.93-4.35], p= 0.07). CONCLUSION: HyFoSy as a first-line infertility test should be discussed in certain circumstances, due to risk of non-visualisation of tubal patency. In case of poor echogenicity, it should be performed by a trained ultrasonographer or a hysterosalpingography should be preferred. For tubo-pelvic pathologies, a laparoscopy should be discussed for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. DISCIPLINE: gynaecology, infertility.